A conclusion is useful only when you can inspect how it was reached.
What Made It? evaluates three evidence channels independently. A result describes patterns present in the submitted file; it does not prove who created the image or why it was made.
One scene, three readingsVisual patterns, file structure and available provenance stay separate.
What does the detector check?
The visual channel looks for local texture, edge and consistency patterns. File evidence reads container structure, encoding and available metadata. Provenance checks look for signed Content Credentials. A missing metadata field or missing credentials manifest is not treated as proof of AI generation.
What can a result establish?
A result can identify technical signals that are consistent with AI generation, editing or camera capture. Each available model channel is shown as a directional signal strength from 0 to 100, together with its threshold state and model version. That number is not the probability that a file was AI-generated. A result cannot establish authorship, intent, copyright ownership or legal admissibility.
Why can the answer be inconclusive?
The controlled Beta distinguishes one-channel indicators from stronger independent agreement. It returns Inconclusive when model channels are unavailable, the file provides no usable directional score, or trusted provenance conflicts with a model signal. A formal production accuracy claim still requires the stricter frozen-threshold, transformation-robustness and untouched-holdout gates.
Image
The explanation applies to the submitted image and keeps each model or provenance channel separate.
PDF and Video
Each selected rendered PDF page or selected video frame receives its own image report. Collection pages remain categorical and never turn selected pages or frames into a whole-file score.
Audio
Each provider chunk within the explicitly selected clip receives its own directional explanation. Chunk scores are not averaged into a probability for the clip or the complete recording.
01
Visual model
Patterns in texture, edges and local consistency.
LimitHighlights supporting regions—not a generator guess.
02
File evidence
Metadata, encoding and structural clues.
LimitCan support a result, but absence proves nothing.
03
Provenance
Signed Content Credentials when available.
LimitStrong positive evidence; many valid images have none.
Decision boundary
Inconclusive is a real result.
When available evidence conflicts or stays below a calibrated release threshold, the system stops instead of manufacturing certainty.
Strong signalIndependent evidence agrees
Capture-consistentSignals fit camera capture; origin is not proven
InconclusiveEvidence conflicts or remains insufficient
Methodology reviewed by the What Made It? product and methodology team · Last updated